Skip to main content

Citius Altius Fortius....

………Or the Olympic motto of Fast, Higher, Stronger has manifested in some astounding moments of human endurance, precision and perfection. These three words have been the hallmarks of human determination, since 1896 in Athens – the year and the venue of the first modern Olympic Games, - to continuously evolve to something hitherto ‘superior’. To continuously extend the frontiers of excellence.

They were [probably] an ambrosia for the era encompassing the late nineteenth century and the pre-world war years, where inadequacies of life and living were stark [at least in terms of base/average levels]. Ill health and hunger were imminent for a much larger proportion of mankind.

These words seemed even more meaningful and appropriate ambassadors, by the Emil Zatopeks, the Jesse Owens, the Dhyanchands and somewhat later Nadia Elena Comaneci or for that matter Mark Spitz. Yes, three words have played a huge part in having millions and many more people to aspire for and achieve dreams that otherwise looked unimaginable. Worth remembering the words of legendary Australian swimmer Dawn Fraser - “The Olympics remain the most compelling search for excellence that exists in sport, and maybe in life itself.”

In addition to the superhuman performance, the camaraderie sparked on the field by the Olympic movement, also sometimes bridged the ideological hollowness of violence and mistrust [aka the legendary story of Luz Long and Jesse [actually J. C.] Owens in the 1936 Berlin Games under the nose of Fuehrer Hitler]. Thus further heightening the overall sense of aura promoted by the Olympic motto.


But then, if we look beyond the realm of human endurance and instead think of other manifestations of human instinct, the nice feel good facet of these three words suddenly speak of a different idiom. They are merely a reflection of the more the merrier syndrome in today’s world. The root cause of avaricious depredation and insensible violence. When scientific advancement replaced unaided human excellence, these very words send a shudder of gloom. The moment stronger meant tanks & AK47s and farther meant Inter Continental Missiles, the death knell had begun. This superimposed with the ever increasing of carnal consumption of goods and entertainment has wreaked havoc.

Thanks to innate human insecurity and greed the advancement of science has invariably accelerated the growing entropy [disorderliness] of our ecosystem. Every significant leap in faster and farther has been used to further the human instinct of aggrandizement. In the modern days, the need for territorial supremacy has significantly limited to oil fields in Middle East and minerals in Africa [we will certainly see mineral wars in Africa in the next few decades]. All to fuel consumption as the the multi-national wars to ‘leverage’ consumer sense of vicarious emancipation.

Clearly, the more we advance the more we will consume and the faster we will be hurtling ourselves towards eco-system imbalance – which manifest themselves in the form of global warming, tsumanis, rising sea-levels, HIN1, lifestyle diseases. Is this the winners’ curse? – more populated countries vs smaller families, lengthening lifespan with shortening marriage span; material abundance with highest ever and growing inequities of income; the pervasive knowledge reservoir in form of world wide web vs the equally pervasive viruses, malwares, trojans etc; the miniscule [though thankfully] followers of WWF [World Wildlife Fund] vs the popular pervert in the form of wrestle-mania WWF.

This reminds me of a still circulating old story I read years back in which an Mexican fisherman [ Goan – in the Indianised version] is pulled up by a Wall Street [Dalal Street] investment banker about why is he wasting time lazing away without ambition. Instead he could use a larger and motorized boat. Make more money, and even more money. The fisherman curiously asked – ‘To do what?’ Pat came the reply, ‘To retire to a peaceful life, where he could live by the seaside. Make merry and fish leisurely.’

One more side story - the other day I was reading Paulo Coelho – in his book, his beggars laughed at the benefactors thinking they had no freedom [as they were chained to limiting paradigms], similarly nomads pitied inhabitants of cities because inhabitants get ossified as they cling to belongings.

Interesting upside down perspectives! But are these manifestations of the changing post-modern world realities - with different symbols, imageries? Are we realizing that it is time to jettison modern, masculine, exclusive, arrogant, more the merrier, external entertainment idioms for post-modern, feminine, inclusive, accommodating, inner enrichment led value systems?


Bhubaneshwar
August 4, 2010

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dura Pahada Sundara [Far-away Mountains are Beautiful]

I realize how seriously we take a place we visit specifically to see it – an event in itself, and how much taken for granted are those places that we can hop in an out with regularity and ease.

Interestingly I had never wrote or thought of writing about Puri or Konark or Cuttack. Places for which reams have been and can be written. The history, the culture, the cuisine and the local chutzpah [espl. Puri / Cuttack]. Even more interestingly, I have never pondered enough on these places and their unique niceties to have them simmering in my cerebral consciousness. They are somewhere deep there sedimented at best; and at [likely] worst, I do not have the desired ammunition to do justice to write anything substantial. Probably, I will have to resort to the frivolous flourish of the might of the language as a cover.

A point to note - I have never seen the Bali Yatra [Cuttackis don’t faint please]. The Puri beach and temple I have always felt is my backyard [so had the taken for granted attitu…

For a religion or a product, an open door policy will work best

In the recent past, we have been witness to catchy rhetoric with regards to religious conversion. Strident calls to banning conversion, Ghar Wapsi, Love Jihad et al. I would like to stick my neck out and say almost everyone, right (‘bhakts’), left (‘liberals’), centre (government), has missed out on the most balanced perspective.
A person has a right to choose a city and country different from his parents, he or she can also change his or her name given by the parents, what is wrong with the person choosing a religion different from he or she was born with.
Religion is an experiential product. Products thrive when they are responsive to customer feedback. We go to five-star hotel to get pampered, if we are unhappy with the service we may not return. If the hotel has a problem with service quality, then over a period of time it will lose substantial business; then either it will buckle up based on customer feedback or will go out of business. That is exactly relevant for a religion too.…